4.5 Article

Longitudinal interference analysis of shale gas multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells upon high-precision pressure test

Journal

ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 2387-2401

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.671

Keywords

industrial application; industrial engineering; multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells; numerical analysis; pressure response analysis; shale gas; well interference

Categories

Funding

  1. PetroChina Innovation Foundation [2017D-5007-0208]
  2. Southwest Petroleum University [PLN201711]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11702300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shale gas plays a crucial role in the national energy supply. However, fast pressure drop, production decline, and water resources pollution caused by well interference and fracture hits become more severe in multi-layer mining shale gas fields. Such as, it is urgent to evaluate the interference of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells (MFHWs) between the upper and lower gas layers in Chinese Jiaoshiba shale gas field. Therefore, we put forward a comprehensive method to analyze the MFHW interference in this paper. The method contains bottom-hole pressure response analysis (BHPRA) during neighboring well fracturing, BHPRA of well interference test, and production dynamic analysis. Our study indicates that longitudinal pressure interference exists between the Jiaoshiba upper and lower gas layers upon the apparent interference pressure response in a multi-well test. However, MFHW interferences occur in the corresponding fracturing stages with shorter distance, and the interference strength is related to both well distance and fracturing scales. The Jiaoshiba upper gas layers can be developed to increase the gas production performance, but it is necessary to maintain a reasonable well spacing to avoid severe interference during the development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available