4.6 Article

Using Space-Based Observations and Lagrangian Modeling to Evaluate Urban Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Middle East

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031922

Keywords

carbon dioxide; emissions inventories; urban; Middle East; satellite; Lagrangian modeling

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [NNX15AI42G, NNX14AM76G, NNX15AI40G, 80NSSC19K0092, 80NSSC18K1307]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE 1256260]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improved observational understanding of urban CO2 emissions, a large and dynamic global source of fossil CO2, can provide essential insights for both carbon cycle science and mitigation decision making. Here we compare three distinct global CO2 emissions inventory representations of urban CO2 emissions for five Middle Eastern cities (Riyadh, Mecca, Tabuk, Jeddah, and Baghdad) and use independent satellite observations from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite to evaluate the inventory representations of afternoon emissions. We use the column version of the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (X-STILT) model to account for atmospheric transport and link emissions to observations. We compare XCO2 simulations with observations to determine optimum inventory scaling factors. Applying these factors, we find that the average summed emissions for all five cities are 100 MtC year(-1) (50-151, 90% CI), which is 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) times the average prior inventory magnitudes. The total adjustment of the emissions of these cities comes out to similar to 7% (0%, 14%) of total Middle Eastern emissions (similar to 700 MtC year(-1)). We find our results to be insensitive to the prior spatial distributions in inventories of the cities' emissions, facilitating robust quantitative assessments of urban emission magnitudes without accurate high-resolution gridded inventories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available