4.7 Article

Conformable core-shell fiber tactile sensor by continuous tubular deposition modeling with water-based sacrificial coaxial writing

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108567

Keywords

Stretchable resistive tactile sensor; Core-shell fiber; Sacrificial coaxial ink writing; Conformable printing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875253]
  2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment and Technology [FMZ201806, FMZ201906]
  3. Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018K291C]
  4. Experience Design Frontier Methodology and Technology Innovation Research Project (111 Project) [B18027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stretchable tactile sensors are popular in soft and conformable electronics, and innovations in their architectural design and manufacturing process are in demand for more advanced applications. In this work, a resistive-type core-shell tactile sensor was designed and fabricated via the coaxial ink writing of a continuous single core-shell fiber. Particularly, a facile tubular deposition modeling method was established, in which deionized (DI) water was selected as the core and first coextruded with the elastomeric shell and then scarified and replaced by injecting liquid metal (LM). To weave the continuous single core-shell fiber, tactile sensing nodes were formed easily and precisely to position-registered mechanical pressure stimuli. The resistive responses including sensitivity, coupling and reliability of the sensor architecture were examined, and the tracing mode was performed. Furthermore, the tactile sensor could be directly patterned on a 3D surface. The core-shell fiber-based tactile sensor design and its scalable manufacturing are significant for the advanced fabrication of 3D printed conformable electronics. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available