4.6 Article

Mobile App to Improve House Officers' Adherence to Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines: Quality Improvement Study

Journal

JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/15762

Keywords

cardiac arrest; advanced cardiac life support; mHealth; quality improvement; medical education

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [T32HL110837, 1R01HL123980]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Effective and timely delivery of cardiac arrest interventions during in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation is associated with greater survival. Whether a mobile app that provides timely reminders of critical interventions improves adherence to Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) guidelines among house officers, who may lack experience in leading resuscitations, remains unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a commercially available, dynamic mobile app on house officers' adherence to ACLS guidelines. Methods: As part of a quality improvement initiative, internal medicine house officers were invited to participate and randomized to lead 2 consecutive cardiac arrest simulations, one with a novel mobile app and one without a novel mobile app. All simulations included 4 cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with different cardiac arrest rhythms and were video recorded. The coprimary end points were chest compression fraction and number of correct interventions in each simulation. The secondary end point was incorrect interventions, defined as interventions not indicated by the 2015 ACLS guidelines. Paired t tests compared performance with and without the mobile app. Results: Among 53 house officers, 26 house officers were randomized to lead the first simulation with the mobile app, and 27 house officers were randomized to do so without the app. Use of the mobile app was associated with a higher number of correct ACLS interventions (out of 7; mean 6.2 vs 5.1; absolute difference 1.1 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.6]; P<.001) as well as fewer incorrect ACLS interventions (mean 0.3 vs 1.0; absolute difference -0.7 [95% CI -0.3 to -1.0]; P<.001). Simulations with the mobile app also had a marginally higher chest compression fraction (mean 90.9% vs 89.0%; absolute difference 1.9% [95% CI 0.6% to 3.4%]; P=.007). Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study suggests that this novel mobile app may improve adherence to ACLS protocols, but its effectiveness on survival in real-world resuscitations remains unknown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available