4.7 Article Data Paper

Genome assembly of six polyploid potato genomes

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0428-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nouvelles Initiatives (Project International) grant from the Centre SEVE (Fonds de recherche du Quebec -Nature et technologies (FRQ-NT))
  2. Compute/Calcul Canada Resource Allocations for Research Portals and Platforms (The Potato Genome Diversity Portal)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [283303]
  4. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  5. McGill Department of Plant Science Graduate Excellence Fund
  6. Margaret A. Gilliam Fellowship in Food Security
  7. Schulich Scholarship
  8. CGIAR Genebank Platform
  9. GIZ on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome assembly of polyploid plant genomes is a laborious task as they contain more than two copies of the genome, are often highly heterozygous with a high level of repetitive DNA. Next Generation genome sequencing data representing one Chilean and five Peruvian polyploid potato (Solanum spp.) landrace genomes was used to construct genome assemblies comprising five taxa. Third Generation sequencing data (Linked and Long-read data) was used to improve the assembly for one of the genomes. Native landraces are valuable genetic resources for traits such as disease and pest resistance, environmental tolerance and other qualities of interest such as nutrition and fiber for breeding programs. The need for conservation and enhanced understanding of genetic diversity of cultivated potato from South America is also crucial to North American and European cultivars. Here, we report draft genomes from six polyploid potato landraces representing five taxa, illustrating how Third Generation Sequencing can aid in assembling polyploid genomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available