4.7 Article

Broad-Spectral-Response Photocatalysts for CO2 Reduction

Journal

ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 653-660

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00325

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0210004, 2017YFA0207301]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975242, 21890754]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [CX2340007003]
  4. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS [QYZDY-SSW-SLH011]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2340000073]
  6. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation [161012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The poor conversion efficiency of carbon dioxide photoreduction has hindered the practical application at present, and one of the prime reasons for this obstacle is the inefficient solar energy utilization of photocatalysts. Generally speaking, it is contradictory for a photocatalyst to concurrently possess the broad-spectral response and appropriate band-edge positions for coinstantaneous carbon dioxide reduction and water oxidation. In this Outlook, we summarize a series of strategies for realizing visible-light and IR-light-driven carbon dioxide photoreduction under the guarantee of suitable band-edge positions. In detail, we overview the absorbance of visible light enabled by narrow band gaps in photocatalysts, the extended photoabsorption from UV into the visible light range induced by defect levels and dopant energy levels in photocatalysts, and a more negative conduction band and positive valence band acquired by Z-scheme heterojunctions in photocatalysts. Then, we highlight the expansive photoresponse of IR light caused by intermediate bands in semiconductor photocatalysts and partially occupied bands in conductor photocatalysts. Finally, we end this Outlook concerning more design strategies and application fields of broad-spectral-response photocatalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available