4.6 Article

A thick yet dense silicon anode with enhanced interface stability in lithium storage evidenced by in situ TEM observations

Journal

SCIENCE BULLETIN
Volume 65, Issue 18, Pages 1563-1569

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.05.018

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Silicon anode; Interface stability; In situ TEM; Dense and thick electrodes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872195]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51525204]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [20K05281]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2192061]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K05281] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing the density and thickness of electrodes is required to maximize the volumetric energy density of lithium-ion batteries for practical applications. However, dense and thick electrodes, especially highmass-content (>50 wt%) silicon anodes, have poor mechanical stability due to the presence of a large number of unstable interfaces between the silicon and conducting components during cycling. Here we report a network of mechanically robust carbon cages produced by the capillary shrinkage of graphene hydrogels that can contain the silicon nanoparticles in the cages and stabilize the silicon/carbon interfaces. In situ transmission electron microscope characterizations including compression and tearing of the structure and lithiation-induced silicon expansion experiments, have provided insight into the excellent confinement and buffering ability of this interface-strengthened graphene-caged silicon nanoparticle anode material. Consequently, a dense and thick silicon anode with reduced thickness fluctuations has been shown to deliver both high volumetric (>1000 mAh cm(-3)) and areal (>6 mAh cm(-2)) capacities together with excellent cycling capability. (C) 2020 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available