4.8 Article

Surveying brain tumor heterogeneity by single-cell RNA-sequencing of multi-sector biopsies

Journal

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 1306-1318

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa099

Keywords

glioma; heterogeneity; multi-sector biopsy; single-cell RNA-seq

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0906000 [2016YFC0906001], 2018YFA0107601, 2017YFA0102702, 2016YFC0902500]
  2. biological medicine department, Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z141100000214009, Z181100001318001]
  3. Postdoctoral Fellowship of Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain tumors are among the most challenging human tumors for which themechanisms driving progression and heterogeneity remain poorly understood. We combined single-cell RNA-seq with multi-sector biopsies to sample and analyze single-cell expression profiles of gliomas from 13 Chinese patients. After classifying individual cells, we generated a spatial and temporal landscape of glioma that revealed the patterns of invasion between the different sub-regions of gliomas. We also used single-cell inferred copy number variations and pseudotime trajectories to inform on the crucial branches that dominate tumor progression. The dynamic cell components of the multi-region biopsy analysis allowed us to spatially deconvolute with unprecedented accuracy the transcriptomic features of the core and those of the periphery of glioma at single-cell level. Through this rich and geographically detailed dataset, we were also able to characterize and construct the chemokine and chemokine receptor interactions that exist among different tumor and non-tumor cells. This study provides the first spatial-level analysis of the cellular states that characterize human gliomas. It also presents an initial molecular map of the cross-talks between glioma cells and the surrounding microenvironment with single-cell resolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available