4.6 Review

Chemical and Bioenergetic Characterization of Biofuels from Plant Biomass: Perspectives for Southern Europe

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10103571

Keywords

energy crops; renewable energy; plant biomass

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
  2. EU (FEDER funds) [RTI2018-100819-B-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Featured Application An overview of the characteristics of biofuels, their feedstock materials including energy crops, and of the techniques and processes for bioenergy production is provided in this review. Abstract The global demand for and, therefore, the production of primary energy is continuously increasing. Consequently, the need to intervene with appropriate measures has arisen in order to achieve sustainable economic, social, and environmental objectives. The reduction of fuel and electricity consumption, the containment of atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (like carbon dioxide, methane, other hydrocarbons, and nitrous oxide), and the improvement of environmental quality in urban centers can be considered to be among these objectives. The search for efficient measures for the overall improvement of the environment is directed towards the replacement of traditional fossil fuels with the production of bioenergy (also known as green energy) from different materials and biomasses obtained from specific agricultural activities and/or plant residues. These materials have physico-chemical and biological characteristics of interest regarding their use as sources of renewable energy. The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of the chemical and bioenergetic characteristics of biofuels, the main techniques and processes employed for their production, and the characteristics of the different feedstock materials, especially potential energy crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available