4.6 Article

Bioactive Glass as a Nanoporous Drug Delivery System for Teicoplanin

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10072595

Keywords

bioactive glass; boron; teicoplanin; drug delivery

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan [MOST-108-2221-E-037-001-MY2]
  2. Kaohsiung Medical University Research Foundation [KMU-KI109004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioactive glass (BG) was made by the sol-gel method and doped with boron (B) to increase its bioactivity. Microstructures of BG and B-doped BG were observed by scanning electron microscopy, and phase identification was performed using an X-ray diffraction diffractometer. The ion concentrations released after soaking in simulated body fluid (SBF) for 1, 4, and 7 days were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, and the pH value of the SBF was measured after soaking samples to determine the variation in the environment. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis was performed to further verify the characteristics of mesoporous structures. High performance liquid chromatography was used to evaluate the drug delivery ability of teicoplanin. Results demonstrated that B-doped BG performed significantly better than BG in parameters assessed by the BET analysis. B-doped BG has nanopores and more rough structures, which is advantageous for drug delivery as there are more porous structures available for drug adsorption. Moreover, B-doped BG was shown to be effective for keeping pH values stable and releasing B ions during soaking in SBF. The cumulative release of teicoplanin from BG and B-doped BG reached 20.09% and 3.17% on the first day, respectively. The drug release gradually slowed, reaching 29.43% and 4.83% after 7 days, respectively. The results demonstrate that the proposed bioactive glass has potential as a drug delivery system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available