4.6 Article

Robust Structural Damage Detection Using Analysis of the CMSE Residual's Sensitivity to Damage

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10082826

Keywords

noise robustness; sensitivity analysis; cross-modal strain energy; damage detection

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51625902]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC0312404]
  3. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province [2019JZZY010820]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809134]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017MEE007]
  6. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province [TS201511016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a robust damage identification scheme in which damage is predicted by solving the cross-modal strain energy (CMSE) linear system of equations. This study aims to address the excessive equations issue faced in the assemblage of the CMSE system. A sensitivity index that, to some extent, measures how the actual damage level vector satisfies each CMSE equation, is derived by performing an analysis of the defined residual's sensitivity to damage. The index can be used to eliminate redundant equations and enhance the robustness of the CMSE system. Moreover, to circumvent a potentially ill-conditioned problem, a previously published iterative Tikhonov regularization method is adopted to solve the CMSE system. Some improvements to this method for determining the iterative regularization parameter and regularization operator are given. The numerical robustness of the proposed damage identification scheme against measurement noise is proved by analyzing a 2-D truss structure. The effects of location and extent of damage on the damage identification results are investigated. Furthermore, the feasibility of the proposed scheme for damage identification is experimentally validated on a beam structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available