4.6 Article

Detection Performance Regarding Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Episodes with Fuzzy Logic Fusion on Single-Channel Airflow Indexes

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10051868

Keywords

obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome; amplitude changes of peaks (ACP) algorithm; fuzzy logic fusion; single channel detection

Funding

  1. FCU/TVGH project
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [TCVGH-FCU1088205, 108-2221-E-035-034-MY2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) affects more than 936 million people worldwide and is the most common sleep-related breathing disorder; almost 80% of potential patients remain undiagnosed. To treat moderate to severe OSAHS as early as possible, the use of fewer sensing channels is recommended to screen for OSAHS and shorten waiting lists for the gold standard polysomnography (PSG). Hence, an effective out-of-clinic detection method may provide a solution to hospital overburden and associated health care costs. Applying single-channel signals to simultaneously detect apnea and hypopnea remains challenging. Among the various physiological signals used for sleep apnea-hypopnea detection, respiratory signals are relatively easy to apply. In this study, a fusion method using fuzzy logic and two single-channel respiratory indexes was proposed. A total of 12,391 apnea or hypopnea episodes were included. The proposed algorithm successfully fused standard deviation of airflow signals (SDA) and amplitude changes of peaks (ACP) indexes to detect apnea-hypopnea events, with overall sensitivity of 74%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 80% for mild to moderate OSAHS. For different apnea-hypopnea severity levels, the results indicated that the algorithm is superior to other methods; it also provides risk scores as percentages, which are especially accurate for mild hypopnea. The algorithm may provide rapid screening for early diagnosis and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available