4.4 Review

Alternative supplementary cementitious materials for sustainable concrete structures: a review on characterization and properties

Journal

WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 1219-1236

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-020-01068-4

Keywords

Concrete structures; Sustainability; Alternative supplementary cementitious materials; Valorization

Funding

  1. Cette recherche a ete financee par le Conseil de recherches en sciences naturelles et en genie du Canada (CRSNG) [RGPIN-2018-04531]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2018-04531]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the main priorities for a government is to achieve sustainable development through strategies to protect the global environment, enhance employee health and safety, reduce emissions, and responsibly use fuels and raw materials across all sectors of the economy. Blended Portland cements containing supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are excellent examples of industrial ecology, offering solutions to reduce environmental impacts in several industries. Through the use of SCMs in cement production, CO2 emissions can be reduced, non-renewable material sources can be saved, waste can be minimized, and the properties of concrete can be enhanced.
Currently, one of the main priorities for a government is to realize sustainable development. Strategies are required to protect the global environment, enhance employee health and safety, reduce emissions, and use fuels and raw materials responsibly across all sectors of the economy. Blended Portland cements containing supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), usually industrial by-products, are excellent examples of industrial ecology. In particular, they offer a solution for reducing environmental impacts from several industries. In fact, with every ton of cement produced, nearly a ton of CO2 is emitted. The use of SCMs as a cement substitution reduces these CO2 emissions, saves non-renewable material sources, minimizes waste, and enhances the properties of the concrete. High-quality SCMs are becoming increasingly restricted. With the growing demands for cement, new sources of SCMs, often called alternative SCMs (ASCMs), will need to be used. However, this brings another challenge, as ASCMs are often comprised of local materials, with smaller volumes and more variable compositions. Accordingly, efficient and rapid methods are necessary for evaluating their performance and reactivity in concrete materials. Moreover, there is a need to characterize the chemical, physical, and mineralogical properties of the ASCMs. This paper presents the requirements for materials to qualify as SCMs, an example of a rapid screening test for assessing the performance of ASCMs, and an inventory of materials with favorable properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available