4.7 Article

Magneto-Liposomes as MRI Contrast Agents: A Systematic Study of Different Liposomal Formulations

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano10050889

Keywords

liposomes; magnetic resonance imaging; iron oxide; contrast agent

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency ARRS [Z2-9218, P2-0084, J3-7494, P3-108]
  2. Prostate Cancer UK [CDF-12-002]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M008657/1]
  4. Marco Polo fellowship (University of Bologna) [01-07-2015/31-12-2015]
  5. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA 17140]
  6. EPSRC [EP/M008657/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of the clinically approved iron oxide nanoparticles (IO NPs) used as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been withdrawn from the market either due to safety concerns or lack of profits. To address this challenge, liposomes have been used to prepare IO-based T-2 contrast agents. We studied the influence of different phospholipids on the relaxivity (r(2)) values of magneto-liposomes (MLs) containing magnetic NPs in the bilayer, where a strong correlation between the bilayer fluidity and r(2) is clearly shown. Embedding 5-nm IO NPs in the lipid bilayer leads to a significant improvement in their relaxivity, where r(2) values range from 153 +/- 5 s(-1) mM(-1) for DPPC/cholesterol/DSPE-PEG (96/50/4) up to 673 +/- 12 s(-1) mM(-1) for DOPC/DSPE-PEG (96/4), compared to free IO NPs with an r(2) value of 16 s(-1) mM(-1), measured at 9.4 T MRI scanner. In vitro MRI measurements, together with the ICP-MS analysis, revealed MLs as highly selective contrast agents that were preferentially taken up by cancerous T24 cells, which led to an improvement in the contrast and an easier distinction between the healthy and the cancerous cells. A careful selection of the lipid bilayer to prepare MLs could offer efficient MRI contrast agents, even at very low IO NP concentrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available