4.3 Article

Contrasting stoichiometric dynamics in terrestrial and aquatic grazer-producer systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages S3-S34

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17513758.2020.1771442

Keywords

Ecological stoichiometry; P; C ratio; terrestrial; aquatic; grazer; producer; bifurcation analysis; sensitivity analysis

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2015-04581]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that the turnover rate of producer biomass in aquatic ecosystems is generally faster than in terrestrial ecosystems. The WKL model describes the flow of phosphorus and carbon through a grazer-producer system, and varying the model parameters can impact the dynamics of different ecosystems of this type. Analysis reveals that the intrinsic growth rate of the producer and the maximal ingestion rate of the grazer play a crucial role in determining the turnover rate and dynamics of the ecosystem.
The turnover rate of producer biomass in aquatic ecosystems is generally faster than in terrestrial. That is, aquatic producer biomass grows, is consumed, and is replaced considerably faster than terrestrial. The WKL model describes the flow of phosphorus and carbon through a grazer-producer system, hence varying the model parameters allows for analysis of different ecosystems of this type. Here we explore the impacts of the intrinsic growth rate of the producer and the maximal ingestion rate of the grazer on these dynamics because these parameters determine turnover rate. Simulations show that for low intrinsic growth rate and maximal ingestion rate, the grazer goes extinct; for higher values of these parameters, coexistence occurs in oscillations. Sensitivity analysis reveals the relative importance of all parameters on asymptotic dynamics. Lastly, the impacts of changing these two parameters in the LKE model appears to be quantitatively similar to the impacts in the WKL model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available