4.6 Article

Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Methane When Using TiO2- or WO3-Doped Sm2O3 in the Presence of Active Oxygen Excited with UV-LED

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal10050559

Keywords

methane; oxidative dehydrogenation; active oxygen; UV-LED; TiO2; WO3; Sm2O3

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K19014]
  2. Research Clusters Program of Tokushima University [1702001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are active oxygen species that contribute to oxidative coupling or the partial oxidation during the oxidative dehydrogenation of methane when using solid oxide catalysts, and those species have not been definitively identified. In the present study, we clarify which of the active oxygen species affect the oxidative dehydrogenation of methane by employing photo-catalysts such as TiO(2)or WO3, which generate active oxygen from UV-LED irradiation conditions under an oxygen flow. These photo-catalysts were studied in combination with Sm2O3, which is a methane oxidation coupling catalyst. For this purpose, we constructed a reaction system that could directly irradiate UV-LED to a solid catalyst via a normal fixed-bed continuous-flow reactor operated at atmospheric pressure. Binary catalysts prepared from TiO(2)or WO(3)were either supported on or kneaded with Sm(2)O(3)in the present study. UV-LED irradiation clearly improved the partial oxidation from methane to CO and/or slightly improved the oxidative coupling route from methane to ethylene when binary catalysts consisting of Sm(2)O(3)and TiO(2)are used, while negligible UV-LED effects were detected when using Sm(2)O(3)and WO3. These results indicate that with UV-LED irradiation the active oxygen of O(2)(-)from TiO(2)certainly contributes to the activation of methane during the oxidative dehydrogenation of methane when using Sm2O3, while the active oxygen of H(2)O(2)from WO(3)under the same conditions afforded only negligible effects on the activation of methane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available