4.5 Article

Study of the methane flow influence in the micro-tribology behavior of DLC coatings deposited by PECVD: a Raman analysis

Journal

CARBON LETTERS
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 47-56

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s42823-020-00148-8

Keywords

PECVD; Raman analysis; sp(3) bond; Methane flow; Micro-tribology; Diamond-like carbon

Funding

  1. national council of science and technology of Mexico (CONACYT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the influence of methane flow on the micro-tribological behavior of diamond-like carbon coatings using Raman spectroscopy. The results showed a direct relationship between methane flow and coating thickness, and the analysis of Raman spectra helped establish the properties of the carbon coatings. Additionally, the study demonstrated a strong correlation between wear resistance and hardness with Raman parameters.
This paper presents a Raman spectroscopy study of the influence of methane flow on the micro-tribological behavior of diamond-like carbon coatings deposited with an industrial plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition system. Results have shown a direct relationship between the methane flow and thickness of the coatings. The analysis of the Raman spectra and deposition parameters allowed establishing the influence of H content with the methane flow, the disorder level and estimation of the sp(3) fraction on the carbon coatings. The micro-tribology tests showed a strong dependence of the wear resistance and hardness with Raman parameters. The coating deposited at 72-sccm methane flow presented a thickness of 1.7 mu m and a sp(3) fraction of 0.33. This sp(3) fraction gave rise to a hardness of 24 GPa and an excellent wear resistance of 3.3 x 10(-6) mm(3) N-1 mm(-1) for this DLC coating. Wear tests showed a swelling in the wear profiles on this coating, which was associated with the occurrence of a re-hybridization process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available