4.0 Article

Neuropsychological profile of Alzheimer's disease based on amyloid biomarker findings results from a South American cohort

Journal

APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 345-350

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1756816

Keywords

Ab42; Alzheimer's disease; cognitive biomarkers; dementia; mild cognitive impairment; neuropsychology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests that the use of neuropsychological testing can contribute to the correct diagnosis of MCI due to AD in a South American cohort, with the best predictor being the delayed recall score on the AVLT.
Objective: Increased life expectancy and exponential growth of adults suffering from Alzheimer's disease (AD) worldwide, has led to biomarkers incorporation for diagnosis in early stages. Use of neuropsychological testing remains limited. This study aimed to identify which neuropsychological tests best indicated underlying AD pathophysiology. Methods: One hundred and forty-one patients with MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment) were studied. A neuropsychological test battery based on the Uniform Data Set (UDS) from the Alzheimer's Disease Centers program of the National Institute on Aging (NIA) was performed and amyloid markers recorded; according to presence or absence of amyloid identified by positive PIB-PET findings, or low CSF A beta 42 levels, patients were separated into MCI amyloid-(n:58) and MCI amyloid + (n = 83) cases. Results: Statistical differences were found in all memory tests between groups. Delayed recall score at thirty minutes on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) was the best predictor of amyloid pathology presence (AUC 0.68), followed by AVLT total learning (AUC 0.66) and AVLT Recognition (AUC 0.59) scores, providing useful cut off values in the clinical setting. Conclusions: Use of neuropsychological testing, specifically AVLT scores with cutoff values, contributed to the correct diagnosis of MCI due to AD in this SouthAmerican cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available