4.6 Article

Evaluation of MSW Compost and Digestate Mixtures for a Circular Economy Application

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12073042

Keywords

digestate; anaerobic digestion; compost; sludge; amendment properties; stability indexes

Funding

  1. Bio2Energy project - MIUR-Regione Toscana [DGRT 1208/2012]
  2. MIUR-MISE-Regione Toscana PAR FAS 2007-2013 in sub-program FAR-FAS 2014 (Linea d'Azione 1.1) [DGRT 758/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to obtain a product with agronomic characteristics and biological stability consistent with the EU fertilizer decree for the market of EU fertilising products three different mixtures obtained from sludge digestate from municipal wastewater treatment plant, fresh compost and mature compost have been studied and characterized. For the experimental activity, the raw samples and three mixing ones were collected for the analytical characterization. The biological stability was then assessed for all samples using different stability criteria such as Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate, Rottegrad self-heating factor, Residual biogas potential. Specific enzymatic tests provided information about the status of nutrient cycles (C, P and S) and to overall microbial activity. Physical (bulk density, particle density, air capacity and water content), nutritional (C, N, P, K, Mg, and Ca) and toxicological properties (seedling growth tests on Lepidum sativum L., Cucumis sativus L., Lolium perenne L.) were also evaluated in order to assess the feasibility of agronomic use of the digestate-based mixtures. All the digestate-based mixtures responded to the main characteristics of compost quality requirements proposed in national and international regulations. The evidence found in this study highlighted that the strategy of mixing of sludge digestates with the composts allowed to mitigate the environmental risk posed by each starting material and to valorize their nutrient content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available