4.6 Article

Joint Audio-Ultrasound Food Recognition for Noisy Environments

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 1477-1489

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2938627

Keywords

Acoustics; Signal to noise ratio; Doppler effect; Microphones; Neck; Noise measurement; Monitoring; Food intake recognition; food recognition; ultrasonic Doppler; maximum mutual information criterion

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [S201906S00018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continuous recognition of ingested foods without user intervention is very useful for the pre-screening of obesity and diet-related disease. An automatic food recognition method that combines the two modalities of audio and ultrasonic signals (US) is proposed in this study. Under a noise-free environment, classification accuracy of an audio-only recognizer is generally higher than that of US-only recognizers, but the performance of US recognizers is unaffected by acoustic noise levels. In the recognition system presented herein, the likelihood score of the audio-US feature was given by a linear combination of class-conditional observation log-likelihoods for two classifiers, using the appropriate weights. We developed a weighting process adaptive to signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The main objective here involves determining the optimal SNR classification boundaries and constructing a set of optimum stream weights for each SNR class. A feasibility test was conducted to verify the usefulness of the proposed method by conducting recognition experiments on seven types of food. The performance was compared with conventional methods that use in-ear and throat microphones. The proposed method yielded remarkable levels of recognition performance of 90.13% for artificially added noise and 89.67% under actual noisy environments, when the SNR ranged from 0 to 20 dB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available