4.7 Article

Effects of di-n-butyl phthalate and di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on the growth, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll fluorescence of wheat seedlings

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 76-83

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.061

Keywords

Phthalate acid esters; Wheat seedlings; Photosynthesis; Chlorophyll fluorescence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phthalates are commonly used man-made chemicals that can be released into soil, water, and the atmosphere. The potential toxicity of phthalates on wheat seedlings has not been well studied. To better understand the deleterious effects of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) and di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) on wheat seedlings, their influences on the following were investigated: plant growth, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), chlorophyll content, initial fluorescence (F-0), maximal photochemical efficiency (F-v/F-m), photochemical quenching (qP), non-photochemical quenching (qN), effective quantum yield of photosystem II (Phi(PSII)), and photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR). Compared with the control, the growth indices (plant height, fresh and dry weights of shoots, fresh and dry weights of roots), Pn, Gs, Tr, Ci, chlorophyll content, F-v/F-m, qP, Phi(PSII), and ETR decreased in the 5 mu g mL(-1) and 10 mu g mL(-1) DBP and DEHP treatments, whereas F-0 and qN increased. When wheat seedlings were treated with 20 mu g mL(-1) of DBP and DEHP, the growth indices, Pn, Gs, Tr, chlorophyll content, F-v/F-m, qP, qN, Phi(PSII), and ETR decreased significantly, whereas Ci and F-0 increased. A decrease in the Pn of wheat seedlings was mainly caused by stomatal limitation in the 5 mu g mL(-1) and 10 mu g mL(-1) DBP and DEHP treatments. However, stomatal and non-stomatal limitations may have caused the reduction in Pn in the 20 mu g mL(-1) DBP and DEHP treatments. Notably, the noxious effect of DBP on the wheat seedlings was significantly greater than that of DEHP. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available