4.6 Article

Terahertz Sensing with Optimized Q/Veff Metasurface Cavities

Journal

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.201902025

Keywords

high Q; V; (eff) cavity; metasurfaces; mode volume; photon lifetime; sensing

Funding

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 1 grant [RG96/19]
  2. Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (AME) Programmatic grant by Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) [A18A5b0056]
  3. Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 2 grant [MOE2017-T2-1-110]
  4. Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 3 grant [MOE2016-T3-1-006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Confinement of electromagnetic radiation in a subwavelength cavity is an important platform for strong light-matter interaction as it enables efficient design of photonic switches, modulators, and ultrasensitive sensors. Metallic metasurfaces consist of an array of planar cavities that allow easy access to confined electromagnetic modes on the surface. However, the radiative and nonradiative losses limit the quality factor (Q) of the resonantly confined mode. Therefore, metasurface designs with effectively low mode volume (V-eff) cavities become extremely important for enhancing the photonic density of states. Here, a symmetric Lorentzian resonant metasurface with lower V-eff is demonstrated as compared to asymmetric Fano resonators. Lower mode volume and optimized Q/V-eff metasurfaces reveal enhanced sensitivity for ultrathin analyte overlayers deposited on metasurfaces signaling enhanced light-matter interaction. Such metasurfaces with tightly confined electromagnetic modes could find wide range of applications in the development of terahertz metadevices including ultrasensitive sensors, bandpass filters, and energy-efficient modulators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available