4.6 Article

Systematic Screening of Deep Eutectic Solvents as Sustainable Separation Media Exemplified by the CO2 Capture Process

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 23, Pages 8741-8751

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c02490

Keywords

deep eutectic solvent; freezing point depression correlation; EHS impact estimation; COSMO-RS; CO2 capture

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinshaft (DFG) [SU 189/9-1]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21861132019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have attracted significant interest in various separation processes, rational methods guiding task-specific DES selection are still scarce. In this work, a systematic method for screening DESs as sustainable separation solvents is proposed and exemplified by the CO2 capture application. To achieve a large screening space, experimentally reported DESs are collected exhaustively from the literature; for most of the studied choline chloride (ChCl)-based DESs, a correlation between their freezing point depression and COSMO-RS molecular descriptors of their hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) is established, which is applied to search a huge number of novel combinations of ChCl and HBD candidates for potential DESs. From the extended database combining experimental and potential DESs, promising CO2 absorbents are screened by integrating (a) the freezing point constraint according to the operating requirement; (b) the estimation of environment, health, and safety (EHS) impacts using quantitative structure- activity relationships methods; and (c) the prediction of thermodynamic properties by COSMO-RS. The practical solvent performance of the top DES candidates is finally studied by experiments, identifying ChCl:ethylenecyanohydrin (at mole ratios of 1:2 and 1:3) as very attractive CO2 absorbents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available