4.6 Review

Bacterial Cellulose-Based Composite Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications: A Review

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 20, Pages 7536-7562

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00125

Keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Scaffolds; Wound dressings; Tissue engineering; Drug delivery; Cancer treatment

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Province Biomass Energy and Materials Laboratory in the Institute of Chemical Industry of Forest Products, CAF from Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [JSBEM202007]
  2. Tianjin Enterprise Technology Commissioner project from Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [19JCTPJC52800]
  3. Key Technology Research and Development Program of Tianjin from Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [19YFZCSN00950]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201708120052, 201708370121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial cellulose (BC), with non-toxicity, high purity, and biocompatibility, has been considered as a versatile candidate for various biomedical applications. Recently, the fabrication of BC-based composite scaffolds compounded with other ingredients such as nanoparticles and polymers has received extensive investigation, which enabled the development of numerous promising biomedical products. Additionally, BC-derived nanocrystals (BCNCs) and nanofibrils (BCNFs) have proven to be promising reinforcing agents in a variety of polymeric scaffolds for biomedical applications. In this review, we summarize recent preparation strategies for BC-based and BCNCs- and BCNFs-containing composite scaffolds and their advances in biomedical applications, including wound healing, tissue engineering, and drug delivery, as well as tumor cell culture and cancer treatment. Finally, we present challenges and future perspectives for BC-based composite scaffolds for biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available