4.6 Review

A Review of Computational Models for the Flow of Milled Biomass Part I: Discrete-Particle Models

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages 6142-6156

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00402

Keywords

Granular materials; Bulk flow; Lignocellulose; Discrete element method; Composite-sphere; Polyhedral; Sphero-cylindrical

Funding

  1. Idaho National Laboratory under U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office [DE-AC07-05ID14517]
  2. U.S. DOE [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  3. DOE, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) via the Feedstock-Conversion Interface Consortium (FCIC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomass is a renewable and sustainable energy resource. Current design of biomass handling and feeding equipment leverage both experiments and numerical modeling. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art discrete element methods (DEM) for the flow of milled biomass (Part I), accompanied by a comprehensive review on continuum-based computational models (Part II). The present review on DEM is primarily focused on the features and suitability of various particle shape models for different types of milled biomass because particle shape is the predominant attribute controlling the flow behavior of complex-shaped granular material. The general strengths and weaknesses in the applicability of those models for the milled biomass modeling are summarized. In particular, comments are provided to balance the numerical model capabilities and the computational cost for the development of DEM models. To our best knowledge, this is the first-of-itskind review on DEM specifically for biomass. Our study indicates that the current DEM models require further development, calibration, and validation based on a deep understanding of biomass particle contact mechanics and experimental data support before they can be reliably used for predictive simulations in handling and feeding systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available