4.6 Article

Video Object Segmentation and Tracking: A Survey

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3391743

Keywords

Video object segmentation; object tracking; unsupervised methods; semisupervised methods; interactive methods; weakly supervised methods

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017XKQY075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object segmentation and object tracking are fundamental research areas in the computer vision community. These two topics are difficult to handle some common challenges, such as occlusion, deformation, motion blur, scale variation, and more. The former contains heterogeneous object, interacting object, edge ambiguity, and shape complexity; the latter suffers from difficulties in handling fast motion, out-of-view, and real-time processing. Combining the two problems of Video Object Segmentation and Tracking (VOST) can overcome their respective difficulties and improve their performance. VOST can be widely applied to many practical applications such as video summarization, high definition video compression, human computer interaction, and autonomous vehicles. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art VOST methods, classify these methods into different categories, and identify new trends. First, we broadly categorize VOST methods into Video Object Segmentation (VOS) and Segmentation-based Object Tracking (SOT). Each category is further classified into various types based on the segmentation and tracking mechanism. Moreover, we present some representative VOS and SOT methods of each time node. Second, we provide a detailed discussion and overview of the technical characteristics of the different methods. Third, we summarize the characteristics of the related video dataset and provide a variety of evaluation metrics. Finally, we point out a set of interesting future works and draw our own conclusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available