4.6 Article

Evaluation of Water Quality in Ialomita River Basin in Relationship with Land Cover Patterns

Journal

WATER
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12030735

Keywords

land use; land cover; factor analysis; SWAT model; expected mean concentration; nutrients; physicochemical parameters

Funding

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNDIUEFISCDI [PN-III-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0721]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper reviews the state of water quality in Ialomita River Basin (IRB), Romania, between 2007 and 2018 using the land use/land cover and basin-specific conditions effects on sediments and nutrients load. On-site monitoring was performed in two control sections of the Ialomita River, one in the upper part of the basin (near Targoviste city) and the second near the discharge into the Danube (downstream of Tandarei town). The statistical averages of water parameters for 10 years' monitoring in the control section that is close to the Ialomita River discharge in Danube were pH = 7.60 (range: 6.41-8.40), NH4-N = 1.20 mg/L (0.02-14.87), alkalinity = 4.12 mmol/L (1.34-6.27), NO3-N = 2.60 mg/L (0.08-17.30), PO4-P = 0.09 mg/L (0-0,31), dissolved oxygen (DO) = 8.87 mg/L (2.72-15.96), BOD5 = 5.50 mg/L (0.01-74.71), suspended solids (TSS) = 508.32 mg/L (15.2-4457), total dissolved salts (TDS) = 733.69 mg/L (455.2-1053), and river discharge = 38.60 m(3)/s (8.22-165). Expected mean concentration and soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) modeling have been employed in the GIS environment to extend the approach to large spatial patterns within the basin. The estimated average specific emission on the total area for nitrogen was 3.2 kg N/ha, and 0.3 kg P/ha for phosphorus highly influenced by the agricultural activities. The results are useful to raise awareness regarding water-quality degradation and the need to stop and even reverse such trends for local and national sustainable development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available