4.7 Article

Shedding Light on the Venom Proteomes of the Allergy-Relevant Hymenoptera Polistes dominula (European Paper Wasp) and Vespula spp. (Yellow Jacket)

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins12050323

Keywords

allergen; Hymenoptera venom allergy; European paper wasp; Polistes dominulavenom; venom proteome; Vespulaspp; venom; yellow jacket

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Association, Future Topic Immunology and Inflammation [ZT-0027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allergic reactions to stings of Hymenoptera species can have serious or even fatal consequences. If the identification of the culprit insect is possible, venom-specific immunotherapy effectively cures Hymenoptera venom allergies. Although component-resolved diagnostics has strongly evolved in recent years, the differentiation between allergies to closely related species such asPolistes dominulaandVespulaspp. is still challenging. In order to generate the basis for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, this study aims at resolving the venom proteomes (venomes) of these species. The venoms ofP. dominulaandVespulaspp. (V. germanica,V. vulgaris) were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Resulting proteins were characterized regarding their function, localization and biochemical properties. The analyses yielded 157 proteins inVespulaspp. and 100 inP. dominulavenom; 48 proteins, including annotated allergens, were found in both samples. In addition to a variety of venom trace molecules, new allergen candidates such as icarapin-like protein and phospholipase A2 were identified. This study elucidates the venomes of closely related allergy-eliciting Hymenoptera species. The data indicates that relying on marker allergens to differentiate betweenP. dominulaandVespulaspp. venom allergy is probably insufficient and that strategies using cross-reactive major allergens could be more promising.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available