4.7 Article

Applying Satellite Data Assimilation to Wind Simulation of Coastal Wind Farms in Guangdong, China

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs12060973

Keywords

data assimilation; WRF; WRFDA; 3DVar

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1502803]
  2. Scientific Research Program of Tsinghua University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the development of the wind power industry in China, accurate simulation of near-surface wind plays an important role in wind-resource assessment. Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have been widely used to simulate the near-surface wind speed. By combining the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model with the Three-dimensional variation (3DVar) data assimilation system, our work applied satellite data assimilation to the wind resource assessment tasks of coastal wind farms in Guangdong, China. We compared the simulation results with wind speed observation data from seven wind observation towers in the Guangdong coastal area, and the results showed that satellite data assimilation with the WRF model can significantly reduce the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and improve the index of agreement (IA) and correlation coefficient (R). In different months and at different height layers (10, 50, and 70 m), the Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) can be reduced by a range of 0-0.8 m/s from 2.5-4 m/s of the original results, the IA can be increased by a range of 0-0.2 from 0.5-0.8 of the original results, and the R can be increased by a range of 0-0.3 from 0.2-0.7 of the original results. The results of the wind speed Weibull distribution show that, after data assimilation was used, the WRF model was able to simulate the distribution of wind speed more accurately. Based on the numerical simulation, our work proposes a combined wind resource evaluation approach of numerical modeling and data assimilation, which will benefit the wind power assessment of wind farms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available