4.7 Article

Microstructural Contributions of Different Polyolefins to the Deformation Mechanisms of Their Binary Blends

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym12051171

Keywords

immiscible polymer blends; polyolefins; deformation mechanisms; commodity plastics; mechanical recycling; structure-property relationships

Funding

  1. Catalisti MIP-ICON project PROFIT (Plastic Recuperation and valOrisation FIT for use) - Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (VLAIO) [HBC.2016.0764]
  2. Catalisti ICON project MATTER (Mechanical and Thermochemical Recycling of mixed plastic waste) - Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (VLAIO) [HBC.2018.0262]
  3. Ghent University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mixing of polymers, even structurally similar polyolefins, inevitably leads to blend systems with a phase-separated morphology. Fundamentally understanding the changes in mechanical properties and occurring deformation mechanisms of these immiscible polymer blends, is important with respect to potential mechanical recycling. This work focuses on the behavior of binary blends of linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and polypropylene (PP) under tensile deformation and their related changes in crystallinity and morphology. All of these polymers plastically deform by shear yielding. When unmixed, the high crystalline polyolefins HDPE and PP both exhibit a progressive necking phenomenon. LDPE initiates a local neck before material failure, while LLDPE is characterized by a uniform deformation as well as clear strain hardening. LLDPE/LDPE and LLDPE/PP combinations both exhibit a clear-cut matrix switchover. Polymer blends LLDPE/LDPE, LDPE/HDPE, and LDPE/PP show transition forms with features of composing materials. Combining PP in an HDPE matrix causes a radical switch to brittle behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available