4.6 Review

Satellite cells in ageing: use it or lose it

Journal

OPEN BIOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.200048

Keywords

muscle stem cell; satellite cell; quiescence; activation; exercise; ageing

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [FDN-148387]
  2. US National Institutes for Health [R01AR044031]
  3. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  4. Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  5. Stem Cell Network
  6. Canada Research Chair in Molecular Genetics
  7. University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Research Institute Eric Poulin Centre for Neuromuscular Disease Scholarship in Translation Research Award
  8. Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarships-Doctoral Award (CGS-D)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals that maintain healthy skeletal tissue tend to live healthier, happier lives as proper muscle function enables maintenance of independence and actuation of autonomy. The onset of skeletal muscle decline begins around the age of 30, and muscle atrophy is associated with a number of serious morbidities and mortalities. Satellite cells are responsible for regeneration of skeletal muscle and enter a reversible non-dividing state of quiescence under homeostatic conditions. In response to injury, satellite cells are able to activate and re-enter the cell cycle, creating new cells to repair and create nascent muscle fibres while preserving a small population that can return to quiescence for future regenerative demands. However, in aged muscle, satellite cells that experience prolonged quiescence will undergo programmed cellular senescence, an irreversible non-dividing state that handicaps the regenerative capabilities of muscle. This review examines how periodic activation and cycling of satellite cells through exercise can mitigate senescence acquisition and myogenic decline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available