4.7 Review

Comprehensive Insight into the Mechanism, Material Selection and Performance Evaluation of Supercapatteries

Journal

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-020-0413-7

Keywords

Supercapattery; Energy density; Power density; Redox materials; Carbon materials

Funding

  1. Technology Mission Division (TMD), Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India [DST/TMD/MES/2K17/29]
  2. International Bilateral Cooperation Division (TMD), Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India [INT/FRG/DAAD/P-09/2018]
  3. Department of Science and Technology [IF170869]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical energy storage devices (EESs) play a crucial role for the construction of sustainable energy storage system from the point of generation to the end user due to the intermittent nature of renewable sources. Additionally, to meet the demand for next-generation electronic applications, optimizing the energy and power densities of EESs with long cycle life is the crucial factor. Great efforts have been devoted towards the search for new materials, to augment the overall performance of the EESs. Although there are a lot of ongoing researches in this field, the performance does not meet up to the level of commercialization. A further understanding of the charge storage mechanism and development of new electrode materials are highly required. The present review explains the overview of recent progress in supercapattery devices with reference to their various aspects. The different charge storage mechanisms and the multiple factors involved in the performance of the supercapattery are described in detail. Moreover, recent advancements in this supercapattery research and its electrochemical performances are reviewed. Finally, the challenges and possible future developments in this field are summarized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available