4.6 Article

Crashworthiness of innovative hexagonal honeycomb-like structures subjected to out-of-plane compression

Journal

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 621-628

Publisher

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-020-4321-2

Keywords

honeycomb-like structure; crashworthiness; basic fold element; structural reinforcement

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875581, 51505502]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620358, 2018T110707]
  3. Training Program for Excellent Young Innovators of Changsha, China [kq1905057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seeking for innovative structures with higher mechanical performance is a continuous target in railway vehicle crashworthiness design. In the present study, three types of hexagonal reinforced honeycomb-like structures were developed and analyzed subjected to out-of-plane compression, namely triangular honeycomb (TH), double honeycomb (DH) and full inside honeycomb (FH). Theoretical formulas of average force and specific energy absorption (SEA) were constructed based on the energy minimization principle. To validate, corresponding numerical simulations were carried out by explicit finite element method. Good agreement has been observed between them. The results show that all these honeycomb-like structures maintain the same collapsed stages as conventional honeycomb; cell reinforcement can significantly promote the performance, both in the average force and SEA; full inside honeycomb performs better than the general, triangular and double schemes in average force; meanwhile, its SEA is close to that of double scheme; toroidal surface can dissipate higher plastic energy, so more toroidal surfaces should be considered in design of thin-walled structure. These achievements pave a way for designing high-performance cellular energy absorption devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available