4.3 Article

Comparative Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Puerarin in Rat Plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS after Oral Administration of Pueraria lobata Extract and Pure Puerarin

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL METHODS IN CHEMISTRY
Volume 2020, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2020/4258156

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Fund for the National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Fund Project, China [81702422]
  2. Jiangsu Commission of Health Foundation from Jiangsu province, China [Z2017017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Puerarin is the main biologically active isoflavone in Pueraria lobata and has a wide range of biological activities. However, due to its poor water solubility and low oral bioavailability, its clinical applications are restricted. Compared with puerarin, the Pueraria lobata extract (PLE) has better water solubility, lower toxicity, and less side effects. In this study, the pharmacokinetics of orally administered puerarin (100 mg/kg) and PLE (763 mg/kg, equivalent to 100.0 mg/kg of puerarin) to rats was investigated by the UHPLC-MS/MS method. Results showed that when the rats were administered PLE, the area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-inf)) dramatically increased from 219.83 +/- 64.37 mu g h/L to 462.62 +/- 51.74 mu g h/L (p<0.01). The elimination half-time (t(1/2)) also increased from 1.60 +/- 0.38 h to 12.04 +/- 5.10 h (p<0.01). The maximum concentration (C-max) of puerarin decreased from 101.64 +/- 41.82 ng/mL to 48.64 +/- 21.47 ng/mL (p<0.01), and time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T-max) of puerarin decreased from 1.46 +/- 1.08 h to 0.54 +/- 0.30 h (p<0.01). Results indicated that the pharmacokinetics of puerarin in Pueraria lobata may be dramatically different from pure puerarin in the plasma of rat, and oral bioavailability of puerarin may be increased when PLE was administrated to rats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available