4.3 Article

Does the Conversion of Household Registration Actually Improve the Happiness of Migrant Workers in China?

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082661

Keywords

household registration; migrant worker; happiness; group difference analysis

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M652486]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [202013011]
  3. Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Project [2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Migrant workers are an important human resource for economic and social development. Considering the government's goal of serving and improving people's livelihoods, improving the happiness of migrant workers is necessary. This study investigates in-depth the impact of the conversion of household registration on migrant workers' happiness, which is represented by a multi-dimensional comprehensive index based on the propensity matching score model and data from the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) in 2017. Moreover, this study explores the different effects of conversion among the groups divided by the characteristics of migrant workers. The results show that from an overall perspective, although the conversion of household registration could improve the happiness of migrant workers, the degree of this improvement is minor. Further, the characteristics of the different groups, including age, educational background, contracted land, collective dividends, and income significantly affect the improvement of happiness. The conversion of household registration has obviously improved the happiness of migrant workers with low educational backgrounds, low income, and contracted land. Based on these findings, the government should take more targeted actions to improve the positive effects of household registration among different migrant worker groups due to the different characteristics in the process of household registration system reform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available