4.7 Article

Performance-driven optimal design of distributed monitoring for large-scale nonlinear processes

Journal

CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 151-159

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.04.012

Keywords

Distributed monitoring; Large-scale nonlinear process; Bayesian fault diagnosis; Kernel principal component analysis

Funding

  1. 973 Project of China [2013CB733600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21176073, 61374126]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-09-0346]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2013FM021]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Centralized monitoring generally involves all measured variables in one model. However, the existence of variables without beneficial information may cause redundancy in the monitoring and degrade monitoring performance. This paper proposes a performance-driven distributed monitoring scheme that incorporates kernel principal analysis (KPCA) and Bayesian diagnosis system for large-scale nonlinear processes. First, a stochastic optimization method is utilized to select a subset of variables that provide the best possible performance for each fault and to decompose the process into several sub-blocks. Second, a KPCA model is established in each block to deal with nonlinearity and generate fault signature evidence. Finally, a Bayesian fault diagnosis system is established to identify the fault status of the entire process. Considering the significant calculation amount in Bayesian diagnosis, optimal evidence source selection is performed to reduce the redundancy. Case studies on the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process and a continuous stirred tank reactor process demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed scheme. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available