4.8 Article

Defining and Targeting Adaptations to Oncogenic KRASG12C Inhibition Using Quantitative Temporal Proteomics

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 30, Issue 13, Pages 4584-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.021

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award for Medical Scientists
  2. Brigham and Women's Hospital MFCD Award
  3. Sidney Kimmel Foundation Kimmel Scholar Program
  4. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Claudia Adams Barr Program for Innovative Cancer Research Award
  5. Hale Family Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) postdoctoral fellowship
  7. L'Oreal-UNESCO
  8. First TEAM of the Foundation for Polish Science
  9. Medical University of Lodz [503/1-090-03/503-11-001-19-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Covalent inhibitors of the KRAS(G12C) oncoprotein have recently been developed and are being evaluated in clinical trials. Resistance to targeted therapies is common and may limit long-term efficacy of KRAS inhibitors (KRASi). To identify pathways of adaptation to KRASi and predict drug combinations that circumvent resistance, we use mass-spectrometry-based quantitative temporal proteomics to profile the proteomic response to KRASi in pancreatic and lung cancer 2D and 3D cellular models. We quantify 10,805 proteins, representing the most comprehensive KRASi proteome (https://manciaslab.shinyapps.io/KRASi/). Our data reveal common mechanisms of acute and long-term response between KRAS(G12C)-driven tumors. Based on these proteomic data, we identify potent combinations of KRASi with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), HSP90, CDK4/6, and SHP2 inhibitors, in some instances converting a cytostatic response to KRASi monotherapy to a cytotoxic response to combination treatment. Overall, using quantitative temporal proteomics, we comprehensively characterize adaptations to KRASi and identify combinatorial regimens with potential therapeutic utility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available