4.8 Article

Glioblastoma Cell Resistance to EGFR and MET Inhibition Can Be Overcome via Blockade of FGFR-SPRY2 Bypass Signaling

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 3383-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.014

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [1S10RR025694-01]
  2. UVA School of Medicine
  3. UVA Cancer Center National Cancer Institute [P30-CA044579-23]
  4. American Cancer Society Research Scholar grant [RSG-15-010-01-CDD]
  5. National Science Foundation Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (NSF CBET) [1511853]
  6. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) [DGE-1321851]
  7. UVA Cancer Center support grant from the National Cancer Institute [P30CA044579]
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1511853] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SPRY2 is a purported tumor suppressor in certain cancers that promotes tumor growth and resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in glioblastoma. Here, we identify a SPRY2-dependent bypass signaling mechanism in glioblastoma that drives resistance to EGFR and MET inhibition. In glioblastoma cells treated with EGFR and MET inhibitors, SPRY2 expression is initially suppressed but eventually rebounds due to NF-kappa B pathway activation, resultant autocrine FGFR activation, and reactivation of ERK, which controls SPRY2 transcription. In cells where FGFR autocrine signaling does not occur and ERK does not reactivate, or in which ERK reactivates but SPRY2 cannot be expressed, EGFR and MET inhibitors are more effective at promoting death. The same mechanism also drives acquired resistance to EGFR and MET inhibition. Furthermore, tumor xenografts expressing an ERK-dependent bioluminescent reporter engineered for these studies reveal that this bypass resistance mechanism plays out in vivo but can be overcome through simultaneous FGFR inhibition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available