4.5 Article

Predicting Trends in Cervical Spinal Surgery in the United States from 2020 to 2040

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages E175-E181

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.055

Keywords

Aging population; Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion; Posterior cervical decompression and fusion; Projections; Surgical volume; United States

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [TL1 TR001434] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: We sought to predict surgical volumes for 2 common cervical spine procedures from 2020 to 2040. - METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2003-2016, nationwide estimates of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) volumes were calculated using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9, ICD-10) procedure codes. With data from the U.S. Census Bureau, estimates of the U.S. population were used to create Poisson models controlling for age and sex. Age was categorized into ranges (<25 years old, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and >85), and estimates of surgical volume for each age group were created. RESULTS: From 2020-2040, increases in surgical volume from 13.3% (153,288-173,699) and 19.3% (29,620-35,335) are expected for ACDF and PCDF, respectively. For ACDF, the largest increases are expected in the 45-54 (42,077-49,827) and 75-84 (8065-14,862) age groups, whereas for PCDF, the largest increases will be seen in the 75-84 (3710-6836) age group. In accordance with an aging population, modest increases will be seen for ACDF (858-1847) and PCDF (730-1573) in the >85-year-old cohort. - CONCLUSIONS: As expected, large growth in cervical spine surgical volumes is likely to be seen, which could indicate a need for increased numbers of spinal neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Further studies are needed to investigate the needs of the field in light of these expected increases in volume.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available