4.2 Article

Clinical Trial Drug Safety Assessment With Interactive Visual Analytics

Journal

STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 355-366

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1736142

Keywords

Adverse event; Clinical trial; Graphics; Interactive; Safety review; Visual analytics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides guidance on how statisticians can assist medical personnel in the entire clinical safety review process using interactive visual analytics. Statistical methods are employed to identify events with stronger evidence of treatment difference, aiding clinicians in further scrutiny and decision making. Tailored approaches for safety topics and challenges in implementing interactive displays are also discussed.
In this article, we provide guidance on how statisticians can use interactive visual analytics to assist medical personnel through the entire clinical safety review process. For the general assessment of safety data (e.g., adverse events, laboratory measurements), we recommend a review flow with the first step using a display that leverages statistical methods to identify events with stronger evidence of a treatment difference. In combination with clinical knowledge, reviewers can identify events that need further scrutiny. Next, clinical reviewers will be provided with displays that show additional details on these events or patient level information to aid their decision making. For safety topics of interest (e.g., suicidal ideation and behavior), we propose a tailored approach to each topic both at the summary level as well as the patient level. Displays will show only information relevant to the specific topic and for the clinical questions of interest. We also discuss some challenges to fully implement and leverage interactive displays and tools. We encourage broad use of interactive visual analytics in the analysis and display of clinical data. Study sponsor: Eli Lilly and Company.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available