4.7 Article

Diabetes Minimally Mediated the Association Between PM2.5 Air Pollution and Kidney Outcomes

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61115-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development, VA Information Resource Center [01]
  2. Institute for Public Health at Washington University in St. Louis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiologic observations suggest that exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes, a causal driver of CKD. We evaluated whether diabetes mediates the association between PM2.5 and CKD. A cohort of 2,444,157 United States veterans were followed over a median 8.5 years. Environmental Protection Agency data provided PM2.5 exposure levels(.) Regression models assessed associations and their proportion mediated. A 10 mu g/m(3) increase in PM2.5 was associated with increased odds of having a diabetes diagnosis (odds ratio: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.32), use of diabetes medication (1.22, 1.07-1.39), and increased risk of incident eGFR <60ml/min/1.73 m(2) (hazard ratio:1.20, 95% CI: 1.13-1.29), incident CKD (1.28, 1.18-1.39), >= 30% decline in eGFR (1.23, 1.15-1.33), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or >= 50% decline in eGFR (1.17, 1.05-1.30). Diabetes mediated 4.7% (4.3-5.7%) of the association of PM2.5 with incident eGFR <60ml/min/1.73 m(2), 4.8% (4.2-5.8%) with incident CKD, 5.8% (5.0-7.0%) with >= 30% decline in eGFR, and 17.0% (13.1-20.4%) with ESRD or >= 50% decline in eGFR. Diabetes minimally mediated the association between PM2.5 and kidney outcomes. The findings will help inform more accurate estimates of the burden of diabetes and burden of kidney disease attributable to PM2.5 pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available