4.7 Article

Time course of bilateral microglial activation in a mouse model of laser-induced glaucoma

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61848-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ophthalmological Network OFTARED of the Institute of Health of Carlos III of the Spanish Ministry of Economy [RD16/0008/0005, RD16/0008/0026]
  2. PN I+ D+ i 2008-2011
  3. ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Redes y Centros de Investigacion Cooperativa
  4. European program FEDER from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [SAF-2014-53779-R, SAF-2015-67643-P]
  5. Articulo [83 118-2017]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport [FPU13/01910, FPU17/01023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microglial activation is associated with glaucoma. In the model of unilateral laser-induced ocular hypertension (OHT), the time point at which the inflammatory process peaks remains unknown. Different time points (1, 3, 5, 8, and 15 d) were compared to analyze signs of microglial activation both in OHT and contralateral eyes. In both eyes, microglial activation was detected in all retinal layers at all time points analyzed, including: i) increase in the cell number in the outer segment photoreceptor layer and plexiform layers (only in OHT eyes) from 3 d onward; ii) increase in soma size from 1 d onward; iii) retraction of the processes from 1 d in OHT eyes and 3 d in contralateral eyes; iv) increase in the area of the retina occupied by Iba-1+ cells in the nerve fiber layer/ganglion cell layer from 1 d onward; v) increase in the number of vertical processes from 1 d in contralateral eyes and 3 d in OHT eyes. In OHT eyes at 24 h and 15 d, most Iba-1+ cells were P2RY12+ and were down-regulated at 3 and 5 d. In both eyes, microglial activation was stronger at 3 and 5 d (inflammation peaked in this model). These time points could be useful to identify factors implicated in the inflammatory process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available