4.6 Article

assignR: Anrpackage for isotope-based geographic assignment

Journal

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 996-1001

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13426

Keywords

animal movement; assignR; avian migration; Bayesian methods; geographic assignment; rpackage; stable isotopes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-1564947, DBI-1565128]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods for inferring geographic origin from the stable isotope composition of animal tissues are widely used in movement ecology, but few computational tools and standards for data interpretation are available. We introduce theassignRrpackage, which provides a structured, flexible toolkit for isotope-based migration data analysis and interpretation using a widely adopted semi-parametric Bayesian inversion method. assignRbundles data resources and functions that support data interpretation, hypothesis-testing and quality assessment, allowing end-to-end data analysis with only a few lines of code. Tools for post hoc analysis offer robust, standardized methods for aggregating information from multiple individuals, assignment of individuals to a sub-region of the study area and comparison of potential regions of origin using odds ratios. Assessment tools quantify the quality and power of the isotopic assignments and can be used to test prototype study designs. TheassignRpackage should increase the accessibility of isotopic geolocation methods.assignRsupports flexible data sources and analysis decisions, making it suitable for a wide range of applications, but also promotes standardization that will help foster increased consistency and comparability among studies and a more holistic understanding of animal migration. Lastly,assignRcan help make isotope-based geolocation research more efficient by helping researchers plan projects to be optimally aligned with their research questions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available