4.6 Article

A Study on Microstructure, Residual Stresses and Stress Corrosion Cracking of Repair Welding on 304 Stainless Steel: Part II-Effects of Reinforcement Height

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma13112434

Keywords

304 stainless steel; repair welding; reinforcement height; residual stresses; stress corrosion cracking

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642723]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51905545]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0808801]
  4. Qingdao Postdoctoral Applied Research Project [qd20180070]
  5. Young Scholar of the Yangtze River Scholars Program [Q2017137]
  6. Taishan Scholar Foundation [ts201511018]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [17CX05019, 18CX05002A]
  8. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019MEE108]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The repair reinforcement height is an important parameter of repair welding, which may have a great influence on structural integrity. In this paper, the effects of repair welding reinforcement height on the microstructure, microhardness, residual stresses and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) behavior of a 304 stainless steel-repaired joint were investigated by experimentation and simulation. With an increase of the repair weld reinforcement height, the delta ferrite content in weld and fusion zone is obviously reduced, and the ferrite shape is gradually changed from the skeleton to the worm shape. With the increase of repair welding reinforcement height, the microhardness and residual stresses decrease gradually. The tensile strength and elongation for higher repair weld reinforcement height are larger than those with lower repair weld reinforcement height. The higher the repair weld reinforcement height, the harder it is for SCC to occur. The repair welding in 304 stainless steel is recommended to be repaired no more than two times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available