4.6 Article

High-Performance Blue OLEDs Based on Phenanthroimidazole Emitters via Substitutions at the C6-and C9-Positions for Improving Exciton Utilization

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 34, Pages 12130-12137

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201602122

Keywords

chromophores; donor-acceptor systems; exciton-utilizing efficiency; organic light-emitting devices; phenanthroimidazole

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273108]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB834803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Donor-acceptor (D-A) molecular architecture has been shown to be an effective strategy for obtaining high-performance electroluminescent materials. In this work, two D-A molecules, Ph-BPA-BPI and Py-BPA-BPI, have been synthesized by attaching highly fluorescent phenanthrene or pyrene groups to the C6- and C9-positions of a locally excited-state emitting phenylamine-phenanthroimidazole moiety. Equipped with good physical and hybridized local and charge-transfer properties, both molecules show high performances as blue emitters in nondoped organic light-emitting devices (OLEDs). An OLED using Ph-BPA-BPI as the emitting layer exhibits deep-blue emission with CIE coordinates of (0.15, 0.08), and a maximum external quantum efficiency (EQE), current efficiency (CE), and power efficiency (PE) of 4.56 %, 3.60 cdA(-1), and 3.66 lmW(-1), respectively. On the other hand, a Py-BPA-BPI-based, sky-blue OLED delivers the best results among nondoped OLEDs with CIEy values of <0.3 reported so far, for which a very low turn-on voltage of 2.15 V, CIE coordinates of (0.17, 0.29), and maximum CE, PE, and EQE values of 10.9 cdA(-1), 10.5 lmW(-1), and 5.64 %, were achieved, respectively. More importantly, both devices show little or even no efficiency roll-off and high singlet exciton-utilizing efficiencies of 36.2% for Ph-BPA-BPI and 39.2% for Py-BPA-BPI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available