4.6 Article

Experimental and Computational Studies on Superhard Material Rhenium Diboride under Ultrahigh Pressures

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma13071657

Keywords

transition metal borides; superhard materials; high pressure studies; diamond anvil cell; ab initio calculations; elastic constants; crystal anisotropy

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation under Metals and Metallic Nanostructures program [DMR-1904164]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An emerging class of superhard materials for extreme environment applications are compounds formed by heavy transition metals with light elements. In this work, ultrahigh pressure experiments on transition metal rhenium diboride (ReB2) were carried out in a diamond anvil cell under isothermal and non-hydrostatic compression. Two independent high-pressure experiments were carried out on ReB2 for the first time up to a pressure of 241 GPa (volume compression V/V-0 = 0.731 +/- 0.004), with platinum as an internal pressure standard in X-ray diffraction studies. The hexagonal phase of ReB2 was stable under highest pressure, and the anisotropy between the a-axis and c-axis compression increases with pressure to 241 GPa. The measured equation of state (EOS) above the yield stress of ReB2 is well represented by the bulk modulus K-0 = 364 GPa and its first pressure derivative K-0 ' = 3.53. Corresponding density-functional-theory (DFT) simulations of the EOS and elastic constants agreed well with the experimental data. DFT results indicated that ReB2 becomes more ductile with enhanced tendency towards metallic bonding under compression. The DFT results also showed strong crystal anisotropy up to the maximum pressure under study. The pressure-enhanced electron density distribution along the Re and B bond direction renders the material highly incompressible along the c-axis. Our study helps to establish the fundamental basis for anisotropic compression of ReB2 under ultrahigh pressures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available