4.8 Article

Correlating Macro and Atomic Structure with Elastic Properties and Ionic Transport of Glassy Li2S-P2S5 (LPS) Solid Electrolyte for Solid-State Li Metal Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202000335

Keywords

elastic properties; glassy solid electrolytes; ionic transport; solid-state batteries; sulfide-based solid electrolytes

Funding

  1. Toyota Research Institute of North America
  2. Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A combination of high ionic conductivity and facile processing suggest that sulfide-based materials are promising solid electrolytes that have the potential to enable Li metal batteries. Although the Li2S-P2S5 (LPS) family of compounds exhibit desirable characteristics, it is known that Li metal preferentially propagates through microstructural defects, such as particle boundaries and/or pores. Herein, it is demonstrated that a near theoretical density (98% relative density) LPS 75-25 glassy electrolyte exhibiting high ionic conductivity can be achieved by optimizing the molding pressure and temperature. The optimal molding pressure reduces porosity and particle boundaries while preserving the preferred amorphous structure. Moreover, molecular rearrangements and favorable Li coordination environments for conduction are attained. Consequently, the Young's Modulus approximately doubles (30 GPa) and the ionic conductivity increases by a factor of five (1.1 mS cm(-1)) compared to conventional room temperature molding conditions. It is believed that this study can provide mechanistic insight into processing-structure-property relationships that can be used as a guide to tune microstructural defects/properties that have been identified to have an effect on the maximum charging current that a solid electrolyte can withstand during cycling without short-circuiting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available