4.8 Article

Iron-Potassium on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Efficient Catalyst for CO2 Hydrogenation to Heavy Olefins

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 6389-6401

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00810

Keywords

CO2 hydrogenation; single-walled carbon nanotubes; heavy olefins; iron; potassium; multiwalled carbon nanotubes

Funding

  1. National Key R&D program of China [2018YFB0604501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872035]
  3. International Joint Laboratory on Resource Chemistry (IJLRC)
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19DZ2270100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The iron-potassium catalysts supported on single- and multiwalled carbon nanotubes, FeK/SWNTs and FeK/MWNTs, were fabricated, characterized, and evaluated in CO2 hydrogenation. The FeK/SWNTs catalyst outperforms the FeK/MWNTs catalyst in selectivity during CO2 hydrogenation to olefins with the selectivities being 62.3% and 52.4%, respectively. Of particular interest is that the FeK/SWNTs catalyst is more selective toward heavy olefins (C-5+(=) selectivity, 39.8%), whereas the FeK/MWNTs catalyst is more selective to light olefins (C-2-C-4(=) selectivity, 30.7%). The FeK/SWNTs catalyst also affords much lower selectivities to undesired CO and CH4 in addition to higher productivity of hydrocarbons, thus resulting in an unprecedentedly high productivity of heavy olefins of 27.6 mu mol(CO2) g(Fe)(-1) s(-1). The more electron-enriched exterior of SWNTs with large curvature, higher abundance of Hagg carbide, and stronger interaction with light olefins may rationalize the superior catalytic behavior of the FeK/SWNTs catalyst in CO2 hydrogenation to heavy olefins. The FeK/SWNTs catalyst also exhibited a minor change in catalytic performance in a 120 h stability test, highlighting SWNTs as a promising catalyst support for producing value-added chemicals from greenhouse gas CO2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available