4.8 Article

Immunogenomic profiling determines responses to combined PARP and PD-1 inhibition in ovarian cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15315-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Stand Up To Cancer-Ovarian-Cancer Research Alliance-National Ovarian Cancer Coalition Dream Team Translational Research Grant
  2. Merck [SU2C-AACR-DT16-15]
  3. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund
  4. TESARO
  5. GSK Company
  6. Merck Co

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combined PARP and immune checkpoint inhibition has yielded encouraging results in ovarian cancer, but predictive biomarkers are lacking. We performed immunogenomic profiling and highly multiplexed single-cell imaging on tumor samples from patients enrolled in a Phase I/II trial of niraparib and pembrolizumab in ovarian cancer (NCT02657889). We identify two determinants of response; mutational signature 3 reflecting defective homologous recombination DNA repair, and positive immune score as a surrogate of interferon-primed exhausted CD8+T-cells in the tumor microenvironment. Presence of one or both features associates with an improved outcome while concurrent absence yields no responses. Single-cell spatial analysis reveals prominent interactions of exhausted CD8+T-cells and PD-L1+macrophages and PD-L1+tumor cells as mechanistic determinants of response. Furthermore, spatial analysis of two extreme responders shows differential clustering of exhausted CD8+T-cells with PD-L1+macrophages in the first, and exhausted CD8+T-cells with cancer cells harboring genomic PD-L1 and PD-L2 amplification in the second. A Phase I/II trial previously revealed variable anti-tumor efficacy of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. Here, the authors perform an integrated genomic and immunomics analysis of tumor samples from the same patients and find potential predictive biomarkers of response to such combination therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available