4.8 Article

DIP/Dpr interactions and the evolutionary design of specificity in protein families

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15981-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 GM30518, R01 MH114817]
  2. NSF [MCB-1914542]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differential binding affinities among closely related protein family members underlie many biological phenomena, including cell-cell recognition. Drosophila DIP and Dpr proteins mediate neuronal targeting in the fly through highly specific protein-protein interactions. We show here that DIPs/Dprs segregate into seven specificity subgroups defined by binding preferences between their DIP and Dpr members. We then describe a sequence-, structure- and energy-based computational approach, combined with experimental binding affinity measurements, to reveal how specificity is coded on the canonical DIP/Dpr interface. We show that binding specificity of DIP/Dpr subgroups is controlled by negative constraints, which interfere with binding. To achieve specificity, each subgroup utilizes a different combination of negative constraints, which are broadly distributed and cover the majority of the protein-protein interface. We discuss the structural origins of negative constraints, and potential general implications for the evolutionary origins of binding specificity in multi-protein families. Dpr (Defective proboscis extension response) and DIP (Dpr Interacting Proteins) are immunoglobulin-like cell-cell adhesion proteins that form highly specific pairwise interactions, which control synaptic connectivity during Drosophila development. Here, the authors combine a computational approach with binding affinity measurements and find that DIP/Dpr binding specificity is controlled by negative constraints that interfere with non-cognate binding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available